Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
i agree with most of this, esp M15, its terrible to play against atm.
What im still having issues with is the complaining about IS1. cause in my eyes it is so much more potent than it should be and is in hardly any way inferior to tigers, cause tigers wont pen but will be penned easily as soon as it is medium range. panthers are a little harder but i think you still have a high chance of pen. i agree that it is a little to expensive and not good in every way BUT if it gets cheaper the armor values def have to be adjusted to reflect how shit the armor really was imo.
I am totally with Kitty here, why would you get fuel dump and fuel price reduction, when germans get no fuel dump at all.. kinda unfair. or at least dont decrease the price as much as it is atm. Stug shouldnt get a RoF buff imo, it can be camoed and has quiet decent chances of bouncing frontal shots. Panzer 4 needs vet 4 at least on panzergrens and maybe wunder (only cause it would make sense in terms of the doc but not necessarily in terms of balance).
Maybe nerf the RoF on 85s
You got some good points here, but I dont agree with all of them.
Yeah, Kübel with mg 42 should be removed from PJ but dont move it to t1. There is no point at all getting a Kübel then, in this tier western allies have at guns that onehit the little thing. It would basically be a waste of ressources and tbh the allies have at since T0 in every faction and doc.
AT rifle nade 100% agreed, dealing higher dmg than Panzershreck on pen like wtf.
Yeah give soviet AT squads something capable of fighting german armor. But nothing that is capable of onetapping like double zooks or piats, soviets got enough onehitting stuff later on, so idk about 2 at grenades.
The rest i agree on pretty much!
About bringing allied AT guns in line: I think Zis 3 can be moved to T2, but not T1 like the other allied ones, tbh it would make more sense if they get moved to t2 as well, since they scale well into T3 wich shouldnt work as well as it does for a T1 AT unit.
to be honest i am no big fan of this rushing playstyle. it always depends who is at the VP or the fuel first and american riflemen are just a little to strong for balanced early game fights at close ranges. But i think as a player that plays OKW most of the times its hard enough to fight royal armour for example, your forward headquarters are just to vulnerable to a rush by 2-3 cromwells in early mid game. if the base buildings become even more vulnerable i could imagine that the game just becomes a try to rush from all sides to destroy base buildings. No one would play late game docs, everyone would play armor docs where you get the cheap medium tanks as fast as possible. but i think you brought up some good points so you could think about what to make out of these ideas!
