Home › Forums › General Discussion › Suggestions › Give sniper to Panzerjager(/mechanised) or change vehicle scopes
- This topic has 2 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 11 months ago by
Olhausen.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
28/06/2017 at 12:09 am #2721
Nyvre
ModeratorSnipers got buffed a lot and these two doctrines cant acces them. I can understand why mechanised has no snipers, since they have recon sweeps and support shock tactics, but panzerjager very much prefers to deal with its issues at range, where the ability to see your enemy before engaging is very useful. I suggest either vehicle scopes are changed or snipers are added to make panzerjager more viable, even if they are going to get reworked eventually.
-
This topic was modified 7 years, 11 months ago by
Nyvre.
-
This topic was modified 7 years, 11 months ago by
-
01/07/2017 at 5:48 pm #2789
sean
Participant100% Agreed,
I spoke with olhausen Earlier Today their are some ideas For those 2 doctrine later on 🙂
For now stick good with ur pumas and hope u got an ally to support you 😀
-
02/07/2017 at 6:36 pm #2798
Olhausen
KeymasterHi guys:
Thanks for your feed-backs. About snipers, the idea is to be fair with the other factions in the counterpart. Just remember the follow:
a. American only have one sniper in the infantry doctrine and is the crappy one. Only 2.2 scope magnification. Then in a future 3 american doctrines will not have snipers
b. British have two doctrines with snipers. Royal Canadian Artillery and Royal Air Forces.
c. Soviet forces all of them, to give more realism. They use snipers a lot during the war
In the axis side we should limit them to maintain some kind of balance. I remove snipers from 2 axis doctrines actually.
a. Mechanized doctrine, this doctrine is more focus on vehicles and we will reworked a lot in a future to show that, that why also dont get a sniper
b. Tank hunter doctrine, I think here the answer is more obvious. This doctrine should be focus on heave AT units and things like that.
The rest of the axis factions have snipers and in a global way is a very good number.
Regards, Olhausen
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Share this:
- Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
- Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
- Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
- Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
- Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
- Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest